Santa Fe
Institute
  • Research
    • Themes
    • Projects
    • SFI Press
    • Researchers
    • Publications
    • Library
    • Sponsored Research
    • Fellowships
    • Miller Scholarships
  • News + Events
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Podcasts
    • SFI in the Media
    • Media Center
    • Events
    • Community
    • Journalism Fellowship
  • Education
    • Programs
    • Projects
    • Alumni
    • Complexity Explorer
    • Education FAQ
    • Postdoctoral Research
    • Education Supporters
  • People
    • Researchers
    • Fractal Faculty
    • Staff
    • Miller Scholars
    • Trustees
    • Governance
    • Resident Artists
    • Research Supporters
  • Applied Complexity
    • Office
    • Applied Projects
    • ACtioN
    • Applied Fellows
    • Studios
    • Applied Events
    • Login
  • Give
    • Give Now
    • Ways to Give
    • Contact
  • About
    • About SFI
    • Engage
    • Complex Systems
    • FAQ
    • Campuses
    • Jobs
    • Contact
    • Library
    • Employee Portal

Science for a Complex World

Events

Here's what's happening

Give

You make SFI possible

Subscribe

Sign up for research news

Connect

Follow us on social media

© 2026 Santa Fe Institute. All rights reserved. This site is supported by the Miller Omega Program.

Home / News

Company mortality: Researchers find patterns in the life and death of firms

April 1, 2015

It’s a simple enough question: how long does a typical business have to live? Economists have been thinking about that one for decades without a particularly clear answer, but new research by SFI scientists reveals a surprising insight: publicly-traded firms die off at the same rate regardless of their age or economic sector.

Companies come and go for a variety of reasons. Some are bought, some merge with others, and some go out of business completely. There’s no shortage of theories about why.

“The theory of the firm—there are whole books on what people think is going on,” says Marcus Hamilton, an SFI postdoctoral fellow and corresponding author of a new paper published in the journal Royal Society Interface. Despite that, he says, “there is remarkably little quantitative work” on what economists call company mortality, and existing theory and evidence yield contradictory answers. Some researchers think younger companies are more likely to die than older ones, while others think just the opposite.

“We wanted to see if there was any kind of standard behavior or if it was just random,” Hamilton says.

Hamilton, SFI Distinguished Professor Geoffrey West, and SFI Professor Luis Bettencourt asked Madeleine Daepp, then an Edward A. Knapp Undergraduate Fellow at SFI and first author of the new paper, to take the lead. “We gave her this basic idea, and she did the heavy lifting,” Hamilton says. 

The heavy lifting, Hamilton explains, was going through Standard and Poor’s Compustat, an expansive database of information on publicly-traded companies dating back to 1950. Using a statistical technique called survival analysis, Daepp and her mentors discovered something no one had predicted: a firm’s mortality rate — its risk of dying in, say, the next year — had nothing to do with how long it had already been in business or what kinds of products it produced.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re selling bananas, airplanes, or whatever,” Hamilton says — the mortality rate is the same. Though the number, of course, varies from firm to firm, the team estimated that the typical company lasts about ten years before it’s bought out, merges, or gets liquidated.

“The next question is, why might that be?” Hamilton says. The new paper largely avoids engaging with any particular economic model, though the researchers have some hypotheses inspired by ecological systems, where plants and animals have their own internal dynamics but must also compete for scarce resources — just like businesses do.

Read the paper in the Royal Society Interface (April 1, 2015)

Read the article in Fortune (April 2, 2015)

Read the article in Time (April 2, 2015)

Read the article on The Atlantic website (April 12, 2015)

Read the article in Yahoo! Finance (August 13, 2015)

...

Image caption: Sizes of some 30,000 companies traded publicly on U.S. markets from 1950-2009, measured by their sales (controlling for inflation and GDP growth). The relatively rapid growth of smaller companies near the beginnings of their lifespans account for the ragged lower portion of the chart, as well as the relatively steep initial sales increases. As companies reach maturity, their sales tend to level off. (Courtesy Marcus Hamilton)





Share
  • Sign Up For SFI News
News Media Contact

Santa Fe Institute

Office of Communications
news@santafe.edu
505-984-8800



  • Tags
  • SFI News Release
  • Research
  • Education
  • Alumni
  • ACtioN


  • Related Projects
  • Cities, scaling, & sustainability


More SFI News

View All News

Why noise may be the key to understanding cell group patterns

Reinventing democracy before it breaks

Do deep learning models recognize 3D shapes in the same way humans do?

Upending assumptions about learning, inspired by an AI phenomenon

Looking at AGI through the lens of natural intelligence

A simple baseline for AI forecasting in machine learning

Constantino Tsallis to co-chair the 2027 Nobel Symposium on Statistical Mechanics

How novelty arrives: Review of “The Origins of the New”

Working group asks, what’s the benefit of a brain?

Measuring irreversibility in gene transcription

ACtioN Academy engages industry leaders on AI and complexity

Arguing for a complex adaptive power grid

Mark Newman Awarded 2026 SIAM John von Neumann Prize

Review: Nonesuch, by SFI Miller Scholar Francis Spufford

Laurent Hébert-Dufresne to receive Young Scientist Award

What does it mean to compute?

Reassessing the scientific method

SFI External Professor Santiago Elena elected to the American Academy of Microbiology

From cells to companies: Study shows how diversity scales within complex systems

SFI Press launches “The Economy as an Evolving Complex System IV”